Positions are what people say they want; interests are why they want it. You will practice translating demands into underlying needs like predictability, recognition, or risk management. Scenarios demonstrate reframing “We must build from scratch” into “We need control and maintainability.” Once interests surface, multiple creative options emerge. This habit expands possibility, preserves relationships, and makes compromise feel like progress instead of loss.
We all climb mental ladders quickly, selecting data and inventing stories. You will practice stepping down by naming observations, separating guesses, and testing conclusions aloud. A scenario models saying, “What I saw was three missed updates; my story is lack of alignment.” Inviting alternate explanations lowers defensiveness. This clarity transforms accusations into joint inquiry, enabling solutions anchored in shared evidence rather than spiraling assumptions.
Peer mediation requires neutrality, structure, and psychological safety. You will set ground rules, time-box exchanges, and summarize verified agreements. Scenarios show using balanced airtime, reflective paraphrasing, and future-focused commitments. You will practice writing a brief alignment note that captures who, what, and by when. Done well, mediation preserves dignity, protects delivery timelines, and teaches colleagues reusable patterns for resolving friction without managerial rescue.